Beginning with the documentation of this piece, it was really strong to have the video clip to see what went on, however there are a few points that could have done more for the piece. The major issue discussed in class was of course conveying what exactly the object being passed around was, but I didn't take as much issue with that as I did with the blocking. It would be easier to communicate the movements with a stronger consideration of what the audience is actually seeing. In terms of the actual piece, I think it was a stronger approach to a narrative piece, as it left some room for interpretation. Well actually, it left the viewer wondering not necessarily what was going on, but what exactly was causing it, fueling the events. That sense of suspense, or an unknown motive was a good decision, although the introduction or setting could better reinforce the overall presentation of the piece.
Beginning with the documentation of this piece, it was really strong to have the video clip to see what went on, however there are a few points that could have done more for the piece. The major issue discussed in class was of course conveying what exactly the object being passed around was, but I didn't take as much issue with that as I did with the blocking. It would be easier to communicate the movements with a stronger consideration of what the audience is actually seeing. In terms of the actual piece, I think it was a stronger approach to a narrative piece, as it left some room for interpretation. Well actually, it left the viewer wondering not necessarily what was going on, but what exactly was causing it, fueling the events. That sense of suspense, or an unknown motive was a good decision, although the introduction or setting could better reinforce the overall presentation of the piece.
ReplyDelete